FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

FZ BIBLE 30/30 UNIVERSES CASSETTES (5TH ACC)

***********************************************

CONTENTS: Universes Cassettes (the 5th Advanced Clinical Course)

32 Cassettes containing 33 lectures plus Introduction and Appendix.
The first lecture is also the final lecture of the 4th ACC and is
numbered 4ACC-72. Posted in 30 files ("+" used where a second item
is in the same file.)

01. ..... Introduction
+ 4ACC-72 29 MAR 54 EVOLUTION AND USE OF SELF ANALYSIS
02. 5ACC-01 30 MAR 54 UNIVERSES
03. 5ACC-02 31 MAR 54 SIMPLE PROCESSES
04. 5ACC-03 1 APR 54 BASIC SIMPLE PROCEDURES
05. 5ACC-04 2 APR 54 PRESENCE OF AN AUDITOR 
06. 5ACC-05 5 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: SAFE PLACE FOR THINGS
+ ..... APPENDIX
07. 5ACC-06 6 APR 54 LECTURE: UNIVERSES
08. 5ACC-07 7 APR 54 UNIVERSE: BASIC DEFINITIONS
09. 5ACC-08 8 APR 54 UNIVERSE: PROCESSES, EXPERIENCE
10. 5ACC-09 9 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CONDITIONS OF THE MIND AND REMEDIES
11. 5ACC-10 12 APR 54 UNIVERSE: CHANGE AND REHABILITATION
12. 5ACC-11 13 APR 54 UNIVERSE: MANIFESTATION
13. 5ACC-12 14 APR 54 SOP 8-D
14. 5ACC-13 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: EXTERIORIZATION AND STABILIZATION
+ 5ACC-13B 15 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: CERTAINTY ASSESSMENT
15. 5ACC-14 16 APR 54 SOP 8-D: LECTURE
16. 5ACC-15 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: UNIVERSE ASSESSMENT
+ 5ACC-15B 19 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: AREA ASSESSMENT
17. 5ACC-16 20 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REMEDYING HAVINGNESS
+ GP-Spec 21 APR 54 GROUP PROCESSING: REACH FOR PRESENT TIME
18. 5ACC-17 21 APR 54 ELEMENTS OF AUDITING
19. 5ACC-18 22 APR 54 SOP 8-DA
20. 5ACC-19 23 APR 54 SOP 8-DB
21. 5ACC-20 26 APR 54 GENERAL HANDLING OF A PC
22. 5ACC-21 27 APR 54 ANCHOR POINTS AND SPACE
23. 5ACC-22 28 APR 54 SPACE AND HAVINGNESS
24. 5ACC-23 29 APR 54 SPACE
25. 5ACC-24 30 APR 54 SOP 8-DA THROUGH SOP 80-DH
26. 5ACC-25 3 MAY 54 VIEWPOINT STRAIGHTWIRE
27. 5ACC-26 4 MAY 54 BE, DO, HAVE STRAIGHTWIRE
28. 5ACC-27 5 MAY 54 EFFICACY OF PROCESSES
29. 5ACC-28 6 MAY 54 ANATOMY OF UNIVERSES
30. 5ACC-29 7 MAY 54 ENERGY - EXTERIORIZATION


**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics. By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. 

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


UNIVERSES (5th ACC) file 30/30 (tape 32)

Transcript of Taped Lecture by L. Ron Hubbard 

5ACC-29 - 5405C07 

Number 32 of "Universes and the War between Theta and Mest" 
cassettes.


ENERGY - EXTERIORIZATION

A lecture given on 7 May 1954


Okay. I want to give you a summary of the application of
the definition to exteriorization, and this application
should be very, very much a part of an auditor's repertoire.

You are looking at something which is not what it is when
you are looking at somebody who is interiorized. It is not
what it is. It's a form-energy production unit in a mass of
energy. Kind of strange. It is in a mass of energy and yet
is an energy production unit; the thetan is an energy
production unit. What, then, is he doing in a mass of
energy. If he can produce energy, if he can cause energy to
come into being, why is he sitting there in the middle of
it? It tells you, then, that he must never ... he must have
lost the idea of thinking of himself as an
energy-production unit; he must be thinking of himself as
an energy preservation unit. That's the first little error
he is making.

This person is as energetic as he can produce energy;
that's all the energy he'll ever have. I don't care how
much he eats; I don't care how much he makes himself
athletic and goes around and pumps the barbells and all the
rest of this balderdash.

I saw a little fellow once, about 110 pounds, pick up a
grand piano and shove it out of a burning house. He never
pushed a barbell in his life. Of course, when he got out on
the lawn; he wondered who brought the piano out. He just
produced enough energy at that moment and overcame enough
gravity and threw enough postulates out the window so that
the piano would dematerialize in the living room, and
rematerialize in the front lawn. And he says, "I wonder who
brought that piano out?"

Now, if he had arduously trained himself so as to eat
Wheaties, why, he would have, of course, left the piano
right where it was.

Now, the athletes who come up and exist and continue in the
society are actually pretty good thetans. They're pretty
good thetans, but they're thetans. And being thetans they
are, of course, capable of production of energy.

No coach has ever really thought to ask himself; "Why is it
that I get two or three athletes here who are just red hot?
Everything is easy for them. They can run the bases and hit
the ball and carry the pigskin or do most anything that
they're supposed to do in this particular line of action
and the result is championship."

I tell you, he goes out... his talent scouts go out and
they try to find other people who can do this. These boys,
they find them, they bring them in, they train them, they
groom them, they feed them Wheaties, they do anything you
can think of in order to bring up their energy coordination
level - their "energy coordination level." The whole society
is fixated on the idea of "If you can coordinate energy,
then you will get along."

And yet if it happens, only one or two great athletes will
appear in a generation, if they appear at all. This is
incredible. Out of 150 million people, out of roughly 75
million men, you get one in a generation who can
coordinate energy well. So you should ask yourself; "Maybe
he isn't coordinating energy?" He isn't; he's producing it.
Nobody ever ate himself into a championship. As a matter
of fact, it's highly doubtful if anybody ever uses the
energy which they consume at the table; this is doubtful.

Now, you'll find your preclear as bad off as he's stuck on
the peak of the curve, which is survive. And here you get
an energy coordination unit; he's holding onto the energy
and spacing it and placing it. He isn't producing any of
it, and he isn't destroying any of it; he's just holding
onto it.

The final reductio ad absurdum is to be at the peak of this
curve and simply be holding on so massively and so strongly
that one is about the size of a grain of sand, completely
solid. And that would be survival.

So your person who is nailed down in his head has abandoned
the production of energy in favor of the coordination of
energy, just like that. And he will sit there and
coordinate energy on and on and on and on and on, as long
as you care to process him, unless you process him off that
peak and in two directions: one toward create and the other
toward destroy. If you would process him off that peak,
why, he will be in good shape.

But as long as you are agreeing 100 percent with his
(quote) "survival goals" (unquote) his case will remain
relatively static, and he will remain nailed down in his head.

One of the things you should find out is what are his
survival goals, and just with malice aforethought knock
them straight out. If all of his goals are survival goals,
and none of his goals are creative goals or destructive
goals, you've got trouble on your hands.

One of the things to do with a case would simply be knock
out all the survival goals which a person had, for
everybody and everything. You'd say, "Well, it would
result, then, and he would be completely antisocial; he'd
be dead against doing anything for his family; he would be
in a remarkable state of no responsibility." Well, you'd
only assume that if you assumed that you as an auditor were
a hypnotist.

You see, only a hypnotist, or his less respectable cousin
psychiatrist, could... Yes, the hypnotist at least
doesn't take his knife to the preclear's brain; he isn't
that desperate yet. When he gets that desperate he gets to
be a psychiatrist. He has the complete other-determinism
command over his subject or patient, you see. And having
this complete other-determinism command, therefore the
patient responds stimulus-response to exactly what the
hypnotist wants him to respond to.

Now, get the slight difference between this and what an
auditor is doing. An auditor doesn't say, "Now, I am going
to strip out all the antisocial commands and leave, then,
just a vacuum." He doesn't say, "I'm going to strip out all
the survival goals of this individual and then just leave a
vacuum." You see, the preclear has something to say about it.

The odd part of it is, is having stripped out the (quote)
"survival goals" of a preclear, the auditor quite often
will discover that all he has done is knock off the
compulsion of the survival goal. And having knocked off the
compulsion, the person now has much greater survival goals
than he ever had before. You're not dealing as an auditor
with a predicted, black and white result, see? You're not
dealing with this type of result. You're not saying, "Now
look, this fellow is a package; he is just sitting there.
And if we take so many cubes out of this package, that will
be minus that many cubes." It's not a mechanical, arithmetical 
problem.

You take a few cubes out of this package, you'll find out
that you have twice as many cubes as before. Your goal is
essentially a creative goal; your goal is not a survival goal.

That's why when an auditor starts in right down the groove
of "Care of the body, care of the body. Let's treat all the
psychosomatics. Let's make the fellow feel happy. Let's let
him live forever, live forever, live forever, live
forever." He's not only a bad auditor; his preclears don't
get well. Why don't they get well? He's just fostering all
the survival goals of the preclear.

Therefore, the treatment of psychosomatic illnesses, as an
auditor will discover after he's been in practice for a
little while, is a waste of time -just that, a waste of
time. In order to treat the psychosomatic illness, it is
necessary to bring the thetan up to the level of being
able to create and destroy before the thetan will alter the
condition of the body.

You can, of course, knock out and repattern, coordinate
enough energy to change the condition of the body. That's
treatment, direct treatment, of the body and psychosomatic
ills. You can do that. It's very spectacular when you do.
But you don't make anybody well doing it. 

What is well? Well, if you just threw the word well out and
put in the word free you'd have it. That would be, in
essence, a better definition of what you're trying to do.

Here you find this fellow nailed down. One of the barriers
which he's dealing with is simply the barrier of a twisted
leg or a psychosomatic deafness or something; that's one
of the barriers he's dealing with. And if you said, "Well
now, let's make this fellow free," then you'd have an
anatomy of what's wrong with him. Freedom could be
refined... defined as a condition resulting from the
relative absence of barriers. That would be freedom. What
is the degree of freedom which an individual can attain?
He, of course, could attain something like absolute freedom
which would be no barriers of any kind.

The whole symptom of boredom is bound up in this matter of
barriers. An individual who has had too many barriers
thrust in front of him is, of course, bored. The person who
is bored is surrounded by barriers. Boredom is a symptom of
"There's no use trying to be free." So you get boredom and
psychosomatic illness tending rather to go together.

But, of course, when the freedom is so restricted that it
becomes painful - which is psychosomatic illness - an
individual can get interested in the fact that he is
restricted way beyond tolerance now. He has an immediate,
active problem. So his boredom may even be waved aside by
bringing in the barrier tight enough so that it hurts.
Well, where he isn't in actual pain, you just release that
pain just a little bit, move the barrier out just a little
bit, and you'll throw the preclear where? You will throw
him into boredom; he's bored without his broken leg. It's a
fact. You can process out psychosomatic illnesses and
process an individual right straight into boredom. And he
gets upset with you as an auditor. A twisted leg was at
least interesting. All right.

No amount of bad theory is going to make anybody well. And
unfortunately no amount of the use of rote processes is
going to make anybody well. You could sit down with a rote
process and just chew on it and chew on it and chew on it,
no comprehension of what you're doing. Yes, you're going to
alter the case somewhat. You're going to alter it but not
really, because there was a particular ingredient missing.
You didn't have much of a direction for your process. You
didn't quite know which way it was going or what factors
were altering. And in the absence of that knowledge your
case, of course, didn't progress very much.

That is why we would be very happy to certify people who had
simply read 14-G, 16-G, 24-G, 28-G - be very happy to - if 
they could process people. Their understanding, however, is
insufficient.

And one of those things that they fail on every time is
simply this: They think the application of a rote procedure
with no distinction in its application will bring about a
miracle. In other words, without determining what the
miracle will be and without understanding the rules of the
road which leads to the miracle, they aren't going to
produce one.

There are times to stop asking and times to start asking,
and these should be related to what your preclear is doing
and the condition he's in. It requires observation. A good
auditor does a fast job; a poor auditor does a very slow
job these days. A bad auditor does a destructive job.

Your first goal, then, is not illness; your first goal is
freedom. And as long as this goal is carried forward, you
are going to be a good auditor.

You should ask yourself, then, "Do you want other beings to
be free?" That is one of the biggest stumbling blocks to an
auditor. An auditor whose own case is not in the most
excellent condition imaginable - he'd hardly dare face that
problem: "Do you want freedom for these people?"

Well, look how mean and destructive and wicked they are;
look how vicious and terrible they are.

The funny part of it is, individuals are vicious to the
degree that they are enslaved. If you want a really vicious
society, find one where slavery is its mode of operation.
That will be a vicious society.

Such a society was the Roman Empire, and it too has come to
pass away.

An auditor who is unwilling to restore freedom to an
individual is an auditor who is actually unwilling to make
anybody well. Because making somebody well must include
making somebody free, and actually making somebody free
makes somebody well.

So an auditor who doesn't sympathize with this goal, who
doesn't know this goal, who hasn't any real way of
monitoring where he's proceeding because his knowledge of
it is too slight, will bring about disastrous results in cases.

The auditor may be telling himself and the rest of the
world that his motives are crystal pure and so on. And as
far as he knows consciously they are. But it just so
happens that he just has bad accidents with preclears. Just
about the time the fellow is about to get well, the auditor
somehow or other kicks the edge of the bed, or the door
which he left open slams in the wind or... There's always
something there. He's a little bit late for his
appointment, and he is just monitoring it down the line as
much as he can to escape the inevitable consequence of
setting somebody free.

This auditor would be much better advised to employ methods
which produce outright slavery on the part of a preclear.
There are such methods - many, many such methods; many more
of them than there have been methods to make people free.
If his goal is slavery, apathy, greater obedience in terms
of must compulsively obey on the part of the preclear, then
he's going to make a sick preclear.

That is why nineteenth-century psychology, psychiatry and
analysis failed in the society. That's why they failed.
Because it would have been necessary, to have made anybody
well, to have set them free, and you will not find anything
about this as an ethic or a mode of conduct in those fields
of (quote) "healing" (unquote). And you really have to put
big quotes around that word.

If they have not the goal to set men free, then they will
not heal. That's all there is to it; it's as simple as
that. You take psychoanalysis. Its primary modus operandi
was to bring about a transfer of the patient to the
analyst. Let's enslave him utterly. Let's even get a
superimposed personality here. Let's build the barricades.
That's their first mode of operation.

How about the field of medicine? I would like to just
introduce that for a moment. The medical doctor with his
insistence upon healing by being quiet, by taking it easy,
by sitting around and resting, by putting people in stiffer
casts - I wonder if medicine really ever makes anybody well.
Or does it simply substitute much more insidious ills for
those obvious ones they take away? I'm afraid the latter is
the case. Does medicine ever make anybody well? Well, as
long as we say "body," we could say, well, all right. But
if we have to say "people," we have to include the thetan.
And medicine is much harder on a thetan than an ill body
was hard on a thetan.

I wouldn't go so far as to say the world would get along
much better without medical doctors. I won't go that far
because they have a use. So do carpenters. So do plumbers.
But they certainly, because of the goals of their own
healing, deserve no higher level than that - carpenters,
plumbers. In fact, there was a carpenter one time got much
more famous than any medical doctor.

Now, where is our ball-up with an auditor? Where's the jam
that he (1) doesn't get preclears easily, and (2) doesn't
do much for them when he does? Where's the ball-up?

It's on that point of freedom. Is he willing to free his
fellow being? If he's not, his fellow being will not get
well. If he is not willing to free his fellow being, he
won't even procure preclears. Look at the horrible trick
that's been played upon this auditor. He has an indistinct,
unknown sort of an impulse to keep everything pinned down
and trapped. He can't quite account for this impulse but he
has it. He doesn't even articulate it. And he is given into
his possession tools which set men free. He will restrain
himself from using those tools simply by not procuring
preclears. If he got hold of a preclear, he'd set somebody
free, wouldn't he? So he'd better not.

An auditor has a rough time of it auditing if his own case
is not in fair shape. But what is his case anyhow? His case
is essentially his understanding. We see that cases make
remarkable advances by the processing of affinity, reality
and communication. Do you know that affinity, reality and
communication, when used in their purest sense, will
compound to have derived from them all mathematics? Do you
know that all mathematics may be derived from that
triangle? That is human experience above the level of
mathematics, since mathematics can be extrapolated from
affinity, reality and communication. We won't go into how
that is done now. It's not even a mathematician's rough
trick. It's not even fantastic. I mean, anybody who
understood arithmetic could follow it down the line and do
it. Well, mathematics are symbolized understanding, and
they are an articulation as in the case of any language.
All language is built out of ARC, and mathematics is just
another language.

And the basic reason behind languages is that man desires
understanding. If he didn't desire to understand, he'd
never go to all the trouble of making up communication
systems as complex as language.

Well, his effort to understand is measured, to a large
degree, by his feeling that he doesn't understand. And if
a fellow doesn't understand, then he has to make an effort
to understand and he has a hard time of it. If a fellow
understands, he understands, that's all.

Now, understanding is compounded of affinity, reality and
communication. When an individual's understanding is great,
his ARC is way upscale. And when an individual's ability to
understand is small, his ARC is accordingly small.

What are you processing in a case? You find you get
remarkable results in processing ARC. You're processing
ARC, that's what you are processing. Well, therefore you
must be processing somebody's understanding. It's a
mechanical, easy, permissive approach, rather a miracle in
itself that such an approach can be - just ARC and other 
such processes.

So the understanding of an individual works up this way to
this great truth: that a man's freedom depends upon his
comprehension and understanding of the fact of brotherhood
with the entire universe. A man who would have great
understanding would have also a brotherhood with the
entire universe. He would also have such nebulous
qualities as charity. Why? Because he has a tolerance of
viewpoints.

An auditor, simply by knowing a few things about his own
impulses, could turn from a bad auditor to a good auditor.

It's a great shock to somebody sometimes to run Be, Have
and Do Straightwire, and to find out that in spite of their
apparent charity their most deep-seated conviction is that
they wouldn't let a starving baby have a boot in the teeth.
They can't let anybody have anything.

Well, run that in terms of freedom. "How much freedom can
you let people have?" Because that's how much understanding 
you are willing to give them. Because freedom and understanding 
and a brotherhood with all the universe are pretty much the 
same thing - pretty much the same thing; they add up to this.

If you truly understand, then you will be truly free.
Therefore, it isn't good enough to run a mechanical process
and expect a preclear to get well if you as an auditor
don't understand what that process is based upon. Because
the preclear won't get well, because you'll find some way
not to free him, since your own understanding of it will be
too poor to convey the process. Too poor? Your understanding 
too poor? We could say it in the same phrase: Your willingness 
to set him free is too poor. You have too little interest in 
setting him free to do it right.

Actually, how much processing do you need to understand?
Darn little. Actually, very little.

You're an energy production unit, not an energy
coordination unit. And as an energy production unit, you
should pay very, very close attention to this fact, that
you are an understanding production unit. The ultimate in
energy would be the ultimate in understanding. And the
ultimate delivery of the greatest amount of energy would
depend upon the ultimate understanding of freedom.

(end of lecture)



_


